|
Thermo-ionic generators produce electricity by
heating one surface and cooling, (removing heat) from another; there is
a vacuum between the two surfaces. The hot surface (cathode) emits
electrons which are collected on the cold surface (anode). The
resulting flow of electrons produces a direct current (DC).
Normally these devices require very high
temperatures and achieve relatively low electrical efficiencies.
However, as with other micro CHP devices, efficiency is not necessarily
the only factor influencing viability. Cost, simplicity and life
expectancy are also key factors.
Further information on thermo-ionic
devices:
Borealis Technical Limited
Eneco
Thermo-ionic Conversion and Related Basic Physics
Odysseus Mission
Planck's Linear Oscillator Concept Of Matter Can Explain Thermionic
Direct Conversion Of Heat To Electricity
|
Thermo-photovoltaic (TPV) electric power generators comprise
a gas burner pre-heated using exhaust heat, with the main flame heating
a radiant emitter. The emitter is surrounded by photovoltaic cells ('solar' cells)
which are particularly sensitive to infra-red (heat) radiation.
TPV electric generators
are used in military and outdoor recreational contexts, for example
recreational vehicles (RVs), and have been proposed as a quiet low
emission power source for electric vehicles.
Current development is focussed on improving
the efficiency of TPV. One particularly promising technology is the DRAX
burner which will heat the emitter to a much higher
temperature, emitting more of the near infra-red and visible radiation
that the photovoltaic cells require. DRAX burners currently require access to pressurised air, with at
least a few tens of millibar pressure. Further development could reduce
the pressure requirement, allowing a low power fan to be used, which
could then be powered by the TPV itself without losing significant
output power. The DRAX burner might offer further
advantages in compactness, in that its intensity of emission would
be increased 50% over Air pre-heat. Working on the assumption of an achievable radiator
temperature of 1300 C from a conventional burner, 1500 C from an air
pre-heated burner, and 1700 C from a DRAX burner, a simple calculation
gives some idea of the advantage which the DRAX burner would have. With
the simplifying assumption of black body radiation, these are the
figures for both Gallium Antimonide and Silicon photovoltaic
cells:
Gallium Antimonide
Fraction of energy available for
conversion
w
Ordinary Bunsen burner 21%
w
Air pre-heat burner 27%
w
DRAX burner 32% (20% improved over
Air pre-heat, 50% over Bunsen)
Silicon
w
Ordinary burner 2.9%
w
Air pre-heat burner 5.4%
w
DRAX
burner 8.4% (60% improved over Air pre-heat, 190% over
Bunsen)
Clearly the DRAX burner would give spectacular increases in efficiency
using silicon cells. Silicon has the advantage of very low cost,
robustness and lower surface reflection losses which further boost its
performance relative to the idealised GaSb result above.
|